Saturday, December 6, 2008

Nobel Fest

Tomorrow marks the start of Nobel Week, when this year's laureates gather in Stockholm with their families and a cast of thousands of support staff, media people, royals, dignitaries, celebrities and students to celebrate great accomplishments in literature, economics and science. Early in the week, the prize winners will give press conferences and a series of lectures on their topics of expertise. I will be outside Stockholm attending the Bonnier Media University Publishing Program 3.0, but if there's a break in the program I'd like to zip back into town to attend Paul Krugman's economics lecture.

If you're not familiar with Krugman (pictured above—without the dress), he's an American economist who became famous in his field in the 70s after developing a new supply system for international trade (Honestly, I don't know very much about this—this level of economics is way over my head. You can read a layman's synopsis of his research here). This is the work for which he's technically receiving the Nobel Prize. But Krugman is better known for his writing in the New York Times, in which he has spoken out against the Bush administration's economic policies since Dubya's first term in office. It's widely assumed that the Nobel committee chose to honor Krugman this year largely as a statement against Bush (although they would certainly have honored him at some point in any case).

Thursday, December 10th marks the Nobel Awards ceremony and banquet, a gala event held in the ornate gold and blue halls of Stockholm's beautiful City Hall. The occasion is extremely formal, but in many ways it's more like the Oscars than the stuffy affair most Americans might imagine. The Swedish and international press pool around the red carpet, remarking on the ladies' evening gowns and narrating the arrival of the celebrity guests and Nobel honorees, play-by-play. The dresses worn by the Swedish queen and princesses obviously get a lot of attention—not only because of who they are, but because they make some daring fashion choices. Queen Silvia was on a Nina Ricci kick for a few years there (which I think is cool), and then for a few years she wore extravagantly beaded numbers by Jacques Zender, that to me looked unappealingly like quinceanera dresses. The past two years she's worn interesting designs by Japanese couturier Gunyuki Torimaro. My favorite one, a dramatic bell-sleeved sheath from 2006, is pictured above. You can see the full gallery of her Nobel dresses since 1976 here, if you care.

Each year, 1,300 people are invited to the Nobel banquet from all around the world, and tickets are enormously coveted. Seats within view of Queen Silvia are considered extremely prestigious. Among the invitees each year are 200 university students from Stockholm, a symbolic gesture honoring future generations of academic achievement that will lead to tomorrow's Nobel Prizes.

The food is also a huge deal during the Nobel festivities: Sweden's top chefs are selected to create lavish menus for the banquet and other soirees during the week. This year, the desserts are being made by Magnus Johnansson, the pastry chef behind Xoko, a really great dessert cafe in my neighborhood. I'm not sure the menu for 2008 has been publicly released yet, but last year's consisted of: "lobster aspic with dill-baked halibut and Kalix bleak roe, young cockerel with cockerel sausage and almond potato-celery root terrine and raspberry and blackcurrant parfait on beds of pistachio with vanilla ice cream." Huh. I think that sounds extremely elegant, but a bit precious, and not sky-high on the yumminess index. Which suggests a fun game! What do you say we play, "What I'd Cook for the Nobel Banquet." I'm going to take some time and really think about that, and I'll report back later today or tomorrow. Please feel free to submit your own fantasy menus, keeping Scandinavian-inspired flavors in mind, of course.

You might wonder why I've been studying up so much on the Nobel Festivities... Well, I was hoping to cover some of the events for CNN International next week. I contacted the producer I've worked with in the past, and he was interested and asked for a more detailed pitch, but then Turner broadcasting laid off a bunch of people in his department this week, and I think he forgot about me (or, um, is no longer working there??). I plan to follow up on Monday, but with the Bonnier Publishing Program next week and the fast pace at work right now, it will be much easier on me if I don't do this additional reporting. Still, being in Sweden during the Nobel Awards is probably a once-in-a-lifetime affair for me, and reporting about it for CNN would be something to tell the grandchildren, for sure. So, we'll see what happens. In any case, I learned a lot about it!

6 comments:

denese said...

Wow. Let me know if you get to go and hear Paul Krugman in person. I'm a major follower-- read him everyday!

How exciting!

Denese

denese said...

PS

Here's the Krugman blog post for the day. Although I'm crazy about him, I'm not crazy about what he's reporting... This one is on unemployment. Ugh.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/terrible-employment-numbers/

Anonymous said...

If the Nobel committee picked Krugman as a means of "needling" Bush, then I guess that makes Krugman a big. Fat. TOOL.

That Ghandi didn't score a Nobel, but Jimmy Carter somehow did sort of betrays the original intent of the prize, I think (especially considering that the Carter prize was also considered a statement against Bush. Wait! That means Carter's a tool, too! Maybe the committee is on to something...).

I don't believe the Nobel prizes were ever intended to be "used" as political statements. And anyway, dissing Bush has been a national pastime for the last 8 years. Krugman is not unique (or even noteworthy) in his blind hatred for the man. So if Krugman was chosen for his NY Times editorials (completely pedestrian) over his actual work in economics (pretty good, I hear), then the prize doesn't really mean all that much.

Actually, why am I getting all worked up about this? The Econmics Prize isn't even a real Nobel! Phew! There is justice in the world, after all.

Artificial Swedener said...

I didn't mean that Krugman got the prize "because" of his NYTimes columns, but the Nobel committee had him on the short list for a long time and decided to give it to him this year, while Bush was still in office.

Why don't you think the economics prize is a "real" Nobel? The Peace Prize is actually separate from the rest of the Nobels, and is awarded in Oslo instead of Stockholm, so I left that out of my post.

denese said...

I don't know if you actually got to cover the Nobel gala, but if not, Paul Krugman has posted the slides he'll give at his speech tonight:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/nobel-talk/

I haven't read them thoroughly but they look like an update on his theories that won him the Nobel.

Denese

Anonymous said...

It's not one of the five original Nobel prizes established by Alfred Nobel. The title of the award is "The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel." This is from the Wikipedia entry on the prize.

Mainly, I think it degrades the prize, and its original intent, if the Nobel committee uses their position to make political statements. The prizes are supposed to be about excellence in a given field. I found an interesting manifesto statement by the National Association of Evangelicals that I think sums up this idea nicely. I've substituted "Nobel" for "Christians" where appropriate. Other substitutions are capitalized:

It is the Nobel Committee's duty "never to be completely equated with any party, partisan ideology, economic system or nationality," because "that way The Nobel Prize loses its independence, The Nobel Foundation becomes 'the regime at Awards,' The Nobel Committee becomes 'useful idiots' for one political party or another, and the Nobel Prize becomes an ideology."